| 
 October 1 A large part of the miseries of today can be 
avoided, if we look at the relations between the sexes in a healthy and pure 
light, and regard ourselves as trustees for the moral welfare of the future 
generations.
 YI, 27 Sept. 1928 
 October 2 What chiefly distinguishes man from to beast is 
that man from his age of discretion begins to practice a life of continual 
self-restraint. God has enabled man to distinguish between the sister, his 
mother, his daughter and his wife.
 WGG, p. 84 
 October 3 Human society is a ceaseless growth, an unfoldment 
in terms of spirituality. If so, it must be based on ever increasing restraint 
upon the demands of the flesh. Thus, marriage must be considered to be a 
sacrament imposing discipline upon the partners, restriction them to the 
physical union only among themselves and for the purpose only of procreation 
when both the partners desire and are prepared for it.
 YI, 16 Sept. 1926 
 October 4 H, 28 March 1936 
 October 5 Absolute renunciation, absolute brahmacharya, is 
the ideal state. If you dare not think if it, marry by all means, but even then 
live a life of self-control.
 H, 7 Sept. 1935 
 October 6 Marriage is a natural thing in life, and to 
consider it derogatory in any sense is wholly wrong. The ideal is to look upon 
marriage as a sacrament, and therefore, to lead a life of self-restraint in the 
married estate.
 H, 22 March 1942 
 October 7 Brahmacharya is not mere mechanical celibacy, it 
means complete control over all the senses and freedom from lust in thought, 
word and deed. As such it is the royal road to self-realization or attainment of 
Brahman.
 YI, 29 April 1926 
   October 8 Ibid. 
 October 9 Auto, p. 25 
 October 10 You will guard your wife’s honour and be not her 
master, but her true friend. You will hold her body and her soul as sacred as I 
trust she will hold your body and your soul. To that end you will have to live a 
life of prayerful toil, and simplicity and self-restraint. Let not either of you 
regard another as the object of his or her lust.
 YI, 2 Feb. 1928 
 October 11 Just as fundamentally man and woman are one, their 
problem must be one in essence. The soul in both is the same. The two live the 
same life, have the same feelings. Each is a complement of the other. The one 
cannot live without the other’s active help.
 H, 24 Feb. 1940 
 October 12 H, 24 Feb. 1940 
 October 13 Nevertheless there is no doubt that is some point 
there is bifurcation. Whilst both are fundamentally one, it is also equally true 
that in that form there is a vital difference between the two. Hence the 
vocations of the two must also be different. The duty of motherhood, which the 
vast majority of women will always undertake, requires qualities which man need 
not, possess. She is passive, he is active. She is essentially mistress of the 
house. He is the bread-winner. She is the keeper and distributor of the bread. 
She is the caretaker in every sense of the term.
 Ibid. 
 October 14 SW, p. 425 
   October 15 Of all the evils which man has made himself 
responsible, none is so degrading, so shocking or so brutal as his abuse of the 
better half of humanity to me, the female sex, not the weaker sex. It is the 
nobler of the two, for it is even today the embodiment of sacrifice, silent 
suffering, humility, faith and knowledge.
 YI, 15 Sept. 1921 
 October 16 Woman, I hold, is the personification of 
self-sacrifices, but unfortunately today she does not realize what a tremendous 
advantage she has over man. As Tolstoy used to say, they are labouring under the 
hypnotic influence of man. If they would realize the strength of non-violence 
they would not consent to be called the weaker sex.
 YI, 14 Jan. 1932 
 October 17 H, 25 Jan. 1936 
 October 18 Woman must cease to consider herself the object of 
man’s lust. The remedy is more in her hands than man’s. She must refuse to adorn 
herself for men, including her husband, if she will be an equal partner with 
man. I cannot imagine Sita ever wasting a single moment on pleasing Rama by 
physical charms.
 Yi, 21 July 1921 
 October 19 Women are special custodians of all that is pure 
and religious in life. Conservative by nature, if they are slow to shed 
superstitions habits, they are slow to shed superstitious habits, they are also 
slow to give up all that is pure and noble in life.
 H, 25 March 1933 
 October 20 Woman is the incarnation of Ahimsa. Ahimsa means 
infinite love, which again means infinite love, which means infinite capacity 
for suffering. Who but woman, the mother of man, shows this capacity in the 
largest measure? She shows it is as she carries the infant and feeds it during 
nine months and derives joy in the suffering involved. What can beat the 
suffering involved by the pangs of labour? But she forgets them in the joy of 
creation. Who, again, suffers daily so that her babe may wax from day to day? 
Let her transfer that love to the whole of humanity, let  her forget that she 
was or can be the object of man’s lust. And she will occupy her proud position 
by the side of man as his mother, maker and silent leader. It is given to her to 
teach the art of peace to the warring world thirsting for that nectar. 
 H, 24 Feb. 1940 
 October 21 Ibid.  
 October 22 YI, 3 Dec. 1927 
 October 23 YI, 25 Nov. 1926 
   October 24 H, 1 March 1942 
 October 25 YI, 15 Dec. 1921 
 October 26 Man must choose either of the two courses, the 
upward or the downward; but as he has the brute in him, he will more easily 
choose the downward course than the upward, especially when the down ward course 
is presented to him in a beautiful grab. Man easily capitulates when sin is 
presented in the grab of virtue.
 H, 21 Jan. 1935 
 October 27 YI, 12 March  
 October 28 Ibid. 
 October 29 The world depends for its existence on the act of 
generation, and as the world is the playground of God and reflection of His 
glory, the act of generation should be controlled for the ordered growth of the 
world. 
 Auto, P. 204 
 October 30 The conquest of lust is the highest endeavour of a 
man or woman’s existence. Without overcoming lust man cannot hope to rule over 
self. And without rule over self there can be no Swaraj or Ramaraj. Rule of all 
without rule of oneself would prove to be as deceptive and disappointing as 
painted toy-mango, charming to look at outwardly but hollow and empty within.
 H, 21 Nov. 1936 
 October 31   YI, 21 May 1931
 |